Skip to main content

Known Vulnerabilities

A readable record of OpenClaw's published security advisories and the major incidents around it. The advisory chart and table are generated from GitHub's security advisories API by node scripts/advisories.mjs --json static/data/openclaw-advisories.json in this site's repository; the data is refreshed by hand (last on 2026-10-18). The prose sections below were last checked on 2026-10-18.

Minimum safe version: the latest stable release

As of 2026-10-18 the latest stable release is v2026.10.4 (published 2026-10-16). Always run the latest stable release, and update plugins with it:

openclaw update
openclaw plugins update --all
openclaw --version

There is no older "safe" version to pin. Many fixes ship only in separate @openclaw/* channel plugins, so updating core alone is not enough.

Advisories list stable patched versions. The extended-stable channel uses monthly patch numbers of 33 and higher (release channels), which don't compare directly. If you run extended-stable, check the release notes, or switch to stable.

Highest patched version in any published advisory: core 2026.9.2 (GHSA-5x6q-wg56-rxg8), @openclaw/* plugins 2026.9.3 (GHSA-xvwp-wmh2-fq48).

The latest stable release, v2026.10.4, is at or above every published fix, so v2026.10.4 (core and plugins) is the minimum safe version.


Advisories at a glance​

722 published advisories in openclaw/openclaw: 14 critical, 249 high, 390 medium, 69 low; 39 with a CVE ID. Most recent published 2026-09-11. Data generated 2026-10-18 from the GitHub API and refreshed weekly.

  • Critical
  • High
  • Medium
  • Low
OpenClaw security advisories published per month, by severityStacked bars, Jan 2026 to Oct 2026. Jan 2026: 3 (0 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low); Feb 2026: 220 (3 critical, 61 high, 128 medium, 28 low); Mar 2026: 204 (10 critical, 70 high, 107 medium, 17 low); Apr 2026: 108 (1 critical, 39 high, 53 medium, 15 low); May 2026: 67 (0 critical, 13 high, 50 medium, 4 low); Jun 2026: 45 (0 critical, 33 high, 12 medium, 0 low); Jul 2026: 0 (0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, 0 low); Aug 2026: 0 (0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, 0 low); Sep 2026: 75 (0 critical, 30 high, 40 medium, 5 low); Oct 2026: 0 (0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, 0 low).Jan 2026: 3 advisories Critical: 0 High: 3 Medium: 0 Low: 0Jan 2026, High: 33Jan2026Feb 2026: 220 advisories Critical: 3 High: 61 Medium: 128 Low: 28Feb 2026, Critical: 3Feb 2026, High: 61Feb 2026, Medium: 128Feb 2026, Low: 28220FebMar 2026: 204 advisories Critical: 10 High: 70 Medium: 107 Low: 17Mar 2026, Critical: 10Mar 2026, High: 70Mar 2026, Medium: 107Mar 2026, Low: 17204MarApr 2026: 108 advisories Critical: 1 High: 39 Medium: 53 Low: 15Apr 2026, Critical: 1Apr 2026, High: 39Apr 2026, Medium: 53Apr 2026, Low: 15108AprMay 2026: 67 advisories Critical: 0 High: 13 Medium: 50 Low: 4May 2026, High: 13May 2026, Medium: 50May 2026, Low: 467MayJun 2026: 45 advisories Critical: 0 High: 33 Medium: 12 Low: 0Jun 2026, High: 33Jun 2026, Medium: 1245JunJul 2026: 0 advisories Critical: 0 High: 0 Medium: 0 Low: 00JulAug 2026: 0 advisories Critical: 0 High: 0 Medium: 0 Low: 00AugSep 2026: 75 advisories Critical: 0 High: 30 Medium: 40 Low: 5Sep 2026, High: 30Sep 2026, Medium: 40Sep 2026, Low: 575SepOct 2026: 0 advisories Critical: 0 High: 0 Medium: 0 Low: 00Oct
Advisories by publication month. Advisories are often published in batches after the fix ships, so a tall bar is a disclosure date, not the month the bugs were introduced. Hover a bar for its breakdown; the table below lists every advisory.

The June and September advisories were each published on one day (2026-06-30 and 2026-09-11) as coordinated disclosures of issues already fixed in released versions.

CVSS labels. Under CVSS 3.1 and 4.0, 9.0–10.0 is Critical, 7.0–8.9 High, 4.0–6.9 Medium and 0.1–3.9 Low (FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification). A score of 8.8, such as CVE-2026-25253, is High, not Critical.

Critical advisories​

The table starts filtered to critical-severity advisories, newest first. Pick another severity, or All, to see the rest; search matches the summary, GHSA and CVE IDs and the fixed-in versions. Click a column heading to sort.

14 advisories
SummaryFixed in
2026-04-16GHSA-xh72-v6v9-mwhcCritical
not scored
Feishu webhook and card-action validation now fail closed2026.4.15
2026-03-31GHSA-g5cg-8x5w-7jpmCritical
9.5 (4.0)
Heartbeat context inheritance bypasses sandbox via senderIsOwner escalation2026.3.31
2026-03-31GHSA-9p3r-hh9g-5cmgCritical
9.4 (4.0)
Sandbox escape via TOCTOU race in remote FS bridge readFile2026.3.31
2026-03-29GHSA-8rh7-6779-cjqqCritical
9.6
CWD `.env` environment variable injection bypasses host-env policy and allows config takeover2026.3.28
2026-03-29GHSA-j7p2-qcwm-94v4Critical
9.6
Incomplete host env sanitization blocklist allows supply-chain redirection via package-manager env overrides2026.3.22
2026-03-29GHSA-hc5h-pmr3-3497Critical
9.4 (4.0)
/pair approve command path omitted caller scope subsetting and reopened device pairing escalation2026.3.28
2026-03-26GHSA-fqw4-mph7-2vr8Critical
not scored
Gateway local shared-auth reconnect silently widens paired device scope from operator.read to operator.admin and reach node RCE2026.3.25
2026-03-26GHSA-9hjh-fr4f-gxc4Critical
not scored
Gateway Backend Reconnect lets Non-Admin Operator Scopes Self-Claim operator.admin2026.3.25
2026-03-24GHSA-hf68-49fm-59cqCritical
not scored
Gateway device.pair.approve Lets operator.pairing Escalate a New Device into operator.admin, reaching Node RCE.2026.3.22
2026-03-13GHSA-rqpp-rjj8-7wv8Critical
9.9
WebSocket shared-auth connections could self-declare elevated scopes2026.3.12
2026-03-12GHSA-4jpw-hj22-2xmcCritical
9.9
Pairing-scoped device tokens could mint `operator.admin` and reach node RCE2026.3.11
2026-02-14GHSA-qrq5-wjgg-rvqwCritical
9.3
Path Traversal in Plugin Installation2026.2.1
2026-02-14GHSA-4rj2-gpmh-qq5xCritical
9.4
Inbound allowlist policy bypass in voice-call extension (empty caller ID + suffix matching)2026.2.2
2026-02-14GHSA-gv46-4xfq-jv58Critical
9.9
Remote Code Execution via Node Invoke Approval Bypass in Gateway2026.2.14

Under each severity is the CVSS score, 3.1 unless marked (4.0); sorting by severity orders by score within a severity. Severity is GitHub's label; advisories without a numeric score are listed as "not scored". "Fixed in" is the first patched openclaw version (or the older clawdbot package), then any plugin or app fixes.

Also notable from February: GHSA-g6q9-8fvw-f7rf (CVE-2026-26322, High), a second gatewayUrl override issue in the Gateway tool, fixed in 2026.2.14.


September 2026 advisory batch (September 11, 2026)​

On 2026-09-11 the project published 75 advisories: 30 High, 40 Medium and 5 Low, none Critical. All were already fixed in releases from 2026.7.1 to 2026.9.3. Two later CVEs without advisories need 2026.9.4 and 2026.9.5; see CVEs without a GitHub advisory. Many fixes are in channel plugins (@openclaw/slack, discord, whatsapp, matrix, msteams, feishu, googlechat, line, voice-call), and three are in the iOS app.

The High advisories scored 8.0 or more:

AdvisoryCVSSSummaryFixed in
GHSA-wwx7-573h-pqwc8.8MCP configuration changes could omit owner authorization2026.7.1
GHSA-8xxh-v4vc-qvm48.8Cron tool could accept mixed-case command payloads2026.7.1
GHSA-9p6m-2872-xm7x8.8Codex bind could omit owner authorization2026.7.1
GHSA-pjjr-5qhr-5w6r8.8Codex computer-use install could omit owner authorization2026.7.1
GHSA-224w-vfr9-h35c8.8Google Meet node commands could skip exec approvals2026.7.1
GHSA-wwcw-jfpp-gpxw8.8Codex native tools could ignore per-chat policy2026.8.1
GHSA-rrxp-5mx8-mvhh8.8Inbound voice calls could inherit owner tool authority@openclaw/voice-call 2026.8.1
GHSA-58qx-6m8p-wh2j8.8Slack group DMs could skip sender allowlists@openclaw/slack 2026.8.1
GHSA-jjpc-p3xf-8g7p8.3iOS Control UI did not enforce saved Gateway TLS pinsiOS 2026.8.11
GHSA-jghr-xp78-995p8.3Browser proxy could miss its admin scope2026.7.1
GHSA-9x88-f7rh-4c838.3Browser node targets could bypass sandbox host control2026.7.1
GHSA-7cp7-87pj-p32v8.3Skill tool dispatch could skip owner-only policy2026.8.1
GHSA-hpg5-cq3m-phqp8.3Agent cron tool could reach operator command jobs2026.8.1
GHSA-p3h6-v2h4-36q28.2Browser CDP connections could discard DNS pinning2026.8.1
GHSA-9m4p-cqp4-jppq8.1WhatsApp login tool could reach non-owner turns@openclaw/whatsapp 2026.8.1
GHSA-p5g8-m35v-7m828.0Claude permission replies could omit owner authorization2026.7.1
GHSA-ghpx-6xwq-2w4w8.0Exec wrapper allowlists could trust arbitrary inner commands2026.8.1
GHSA-9f86-pvv5-rxfw8.0Escaped newlines could confuse exec allowlist parsing2026.8.1

Several of these weaken exec allowlists and approvals, which is one reason upstream calls approvals guardrails rather than a sandbox. See exec approvals and sandboxing.


Other OpenClaw components​

The counts and chart above cover openclaw/openclaw only. As of 2026-10-18, two other repositories in the openclaw organisation have published advisories, and NVD lists a few OpenClaw CVEs that have no GitHub advisory.

CVEs without a GitHub advisory​

VulnCheck issued two CVEs on 2026-09-29 whose fixes come after the September batch, so "fixed in 2026.7.1–2026.9.3" is not the whole floor. Both are fixed in the current stable release.

CVESummaryFixed in
CVE-2026-102806The Gateway's local media-root allowlist let a sandboxed session read sibling sessions' sandboxes and shared workspace directories2026.9.5
CVE-2026-102807mcp.app.view let operator.read tokens run MCP App tools that need operator.write2026.9.4
CVE-2026-94094Canvas host route buffers a whole file per request, a denial-of-service with a public PoC (VulDB, Low)Unconfirmed. The reporter says it was unfixed in 2026.9.5; clawdocs could not confirm whether 2026.10.4 fixes it. Do not expose the Canvas host to untrusted networks.

Windows Node (openclaw-windows-node)​

On 2026-09-03 openclaw-windows-node published 8 advisories (6 High, 2 Medium), all fixed in v2026.7.1-3. Update the Windows companion app if you run it as a node.

AdvisorySeveritySummary
GHSA-fxch-cgcp-4v5hHighscreen.snapshot, camera.snap and location.get skipped per-use consent (silent capture)
GHSA-r3x2-vf2f-vvj8, GHSA-vg38-vjq2-vgvhHighExec-approval rules missed pipeline | and $(...) stages
GHSA-f32j-8759-w2fp, GHSA-g95v-c9r6-2hmqHighsystem.execApprovals.set accepted wildcard and living-off-the-land allow rules, so a caller could self-grant arbitrary exec
GHSA-39cf-qcfw-g8pgHighEnv-override sanitizer missed GIT_CONFIG_*, DOTNET_STARTUP_HOOKS and JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS
GHSA-xxr2-xm56-9cw5MediumUnbounded multi-frame WebSocket message (memory DoS)
GHSA-7vch-pmw9-3g4qMediumcanvas.present skipped URL risk checks (SSRF to localhost and private networks)

The records disagree on the last one: NVD's CVE-2026-101883 says Windows Node is affected "through 2026.9.4", while the GitHub advisory says v2026.7.1-3 fixed it. Run the newest Windows Node release.

ClawHub (openclaw/clawhub)​

On 2026-09-11 ClawHub published 5 advisories, all Medium on GitHub and all fixed on clawhub.ai the same day. They affect the registry service, not the OpenClaw runtime or the clawhub CLI, so there is nothing to update locally.

ClawScan and third-party plugins​

  • ClawScan (the skill scanner ClawHub uses) up to 0.1.6 had three scanner-bypass CVEs, fixed in 0.1.7 (2026-09-04): CVE-2026-91835, CVE-2026-91836 and CVE-2026-110689. A public proof of concept for a skill that evades scanners exists, which is another reason to read a skill before installing it (Skill Verification).
  • pinclaw, a community channel plugin (npm pinclaw), through 0.3.0 skips its auth token on POST /pinclaw/send and listens on port 18790 on all interfaces, so anyone who can reach it can inject prompts into the agent (CVE-2026-108757, High, 2026-10-11). 0.3.0 is the newest release on npm as of 2026-10-18. Uninstall it or firewall the port.

June 2026 Advisory Batch (June 30, 2026)​

On 2026-06-30 the project published 45 advisories: 33 High and 12 Medium. They were a coordinated disclosure of issues already fixed between v2026.5.12 and v2026.6.9. Ten of them, including GHSA-7vrr-rp4x-4g76, were fixed only in v2026.6.9 (released 2026-06-21). Version 2026.6.8 was not enough.

Notable advisories​

AdvisoryIssueCVSSAffectedFixed in
GHSA-7vrr-rp4x-4g76Plugin install commands could allow non-owner persistence8.8 (High)≥ 2026.5.20, < 2026.6.92026.6.9
GHSA-3fp5-v549-9v66flock wrapper could bypass durable exec approval binding8.8 (High)see advisory2026.6.9
GHSA-mm9g-83wh-mhwjIsolated cron jobs could regain denied exec tools8.8 (High)see advisory2026.6.9
GHSA-52xj-c9p8-78cvMCP loopback could expose owner-only tools to non-owner runs8.3 (High)≥ 2026.5.20, < 2026.6.62026.6.6
GHSA-jhfx-v2j8-x3m6OpenAI-compatible HTTP model overrides could miss admin authorization7.6 (High)≤ 2026.6.62026.6.8
GHSA-wgq8-x5wm-g4rwPlugin install wrappers could skip install policy4.9 (Medium)≥ 2026.6.5, < 2026.6.92026.6.9

v2026.6.11 security hardening​

The v2026.6.11 release (June 30, 2026) added further fixes (CHANGELOG/2026.6.11.md upstream):

  • Control UI DOMPurify update (GHSA-cmwh-pvxp-8882, CVE-2026-65898, a DOMPurify advisory in GitHub's global database). The bundled sanitizer moved to a patched DOMPurify release (PR #95691).
  • Lookalike package-source rejection. Trusted package sources now reject lookalike sibling paths. For example, trusting /artifactory/openclaw no longer admits /artifactory/openclaw-malicious.
  • ClawHub client DoS hardening. Oversized or stalled marketplace responses are cut off before they exhaust memory (PR #95226).

CVE-2026-25253: One-Click Remote Code Execution​

FieldValue
CVECVE-2026-25253
GHSAGHSA-g8p2-7wf7-98mq
CVSS8.8 (High, CVSS 3.1)
CWECWE-669 (NVD); GitHub's advisory lists CWE-200
Affectedpackage clawdbot ≤ 2026.1.28
Fixed inv2026.1.29 (released 2026-01-30); advisory published 2026-01-31
CreditsDepthFirstDisclosures, Mav Levin (depthfirst), 0xacb

Description​

The Control UI trusted a gatewayUrl value from the query string and connected to it automatically on load, sending the stored Gateway token in the WebSocket connect payload. An attacker who got a victim to open a crafted link received the token, could then connect to the victim's Gateway, change sandbox and tool policy, and run privileged actions. The fix makes users confirm a new Gateway URL in the UI (advisory).

Attack flow​

Even loopback-only instances were exposed, because the victim's own browser made the connection.

GHSA-q284-4pvr-m585 (CVE-2026-25157, CVSS 7.7 High): OS command injection through the project root path in the macOS app's sshNodeCommand. Fixed in v2026.1.29.

Advisories issued by others​


Gateway authentication bypass (JFrog, February 2026)​

JFrog's "Giving OpenClaw the Keys to Your Kingdom" reported that 93.4% of publicly reachable instances it examined had critical authentication bypasses.

The historical mechanism. Older Gateways trusted connections from 127.0.0.1. Behind a same-host reverse proxy every request arrived from localhost, so the Gateway treated it as local. This was fixed by PR #1795, "prevent auth bypass when behind unconfigured reverse proxy", merged 2026-01-25.

Current behaviour. Forwarded headers on a loopback request disqualify it from local trust. With token or password auth, an unconfigured same-host proxy gets 403 proxy_attribution_required. A proxy only counts as trusted when listed in gateway.trustedProxies (network exposure). Setup: Security Hardening: reverse proxies.


Exposed Instances (January-February 2026)​

Several firms counted OpenClaw instances reachable from the internet. These are third-party figures from early 2026, not current numbers:

FirmDateCountMethod
CensysJan 3121,639Internet-wide scanning
SecurityScorecard STRIKEFeb 240,214Favicon fingerprinting
ShodanFeb 942,665Service fingerprinting
Follow-up scansFeb 9135,000+Expanded detection

Terrace Networks reported that exploitation scanning started within hours of public announcements.

Root cause. Not a 0.0.0.0 default on host installs: auto bind has been loopback-first since v2026.1.21 (CHANGELOG/2026.1.21.md upstream). The exposure came from deployments that chose a LAN or public bind, published Docker ports on every interface (the Docker setup still defaults to lan bind, see Docker), or put a public reverse proxy in front.

Check whether you are exposed​

Scan from a machine outside your network. Checking from the host itself only tests the bind:

nmap -sT -p 18789 <public-ip>

If the port is open, fix it:

openclaw config set gateway.bind loopback
openclaw gateway restart

Docker: change the published port to 127.0.0.1:18789:18789 and add DOCKER-USER rules (firewall). Then rotate the Gateway token, because it may have been seen (incident response).


Malicious ClawHub Skills (February 2026)​

The ClawHavoc Campaign​

Koi Security researcher Oren Yomtov audited the 2,857 skills then on ClawHub and found 341 malicious skills across several coordinated campaigns (Koi Security):

  • 335 skills delivered Atomic Stealer (AMOS) macOS malware through "Prerequisites" sections that told users to download a password-protected ZIP or run an obfuscated script
  • They posed as crypto trading automation, YouTube utilities or auto-updaters
  • Campaign window: January 27–29, 2026
  • Targets: exchange API keys, wallet keys, SSH credentials, browser passwords

The "What Would Elon Do?" skill​

Cisco's AI Defense team found that ClawHub's most popular community skill at the time (its ranking had been gamed) had 9 vulnerabilities, 2 critical, including silent data exfiltration and direct prompt injection. Cisco released an open-source Skill Scanner.

Snyk studies (February 5, 2026)​

Snyk's ToxicSkills audit of 3,984 skills from ClawHub and skills.sh found 1,467 (36%) with security flaws, 534 (13.4%) critical, and 76 confirmed malicious payloads. Snyk called it "the first documented supply-chain attack specifically targeting AI agent skills" (SKILL.md to Shell Access in Three Lines of Markdown). A separate Snyk audit found 283 skills (7.1%) that pass API keys through the model context, where they end up in logs and transcripts. Snyk's scanner, formerly mcp-scan, is now snyk/agent-scan.

Bitdefender estimated that nearly 900 skills (about 20%) contained malicious content, the highest estimate published.

What changed on ClawHub​

As of 2026-10-18, per the ClawHub repository:

  • Publishing a skill requires a GitHub account at least 14 days old. At the time of ClawHavoc the requirement was one week (security and moderation spec).
  • Every release gets an audit status (Pass, Review, Warn, Malicious, Pending, Error) and a risk level, shown before install (security audits). Scan sources include VirusTotal, ClawScan and static analysis, with SkillSpector and AIG reports where retained (openclaw skills).
  • openclaw skills verify @owner/<slug> fetches that trust envelope. OpenClaw refuses malicious or blocked community releases at install time.
  • Reports no longer auto-hide skills. Earlier write-ups (including this page) said skills were hidden after 3 or 4 reports. The current spec says reports "never change skill visibility or installability automatically"; moderators review them.
  • OpenClaw's built-in code safety scanner (added in v2026.2.6) runs on installed skills as part of openclaw security audit --deep.

How to review a skill yourself: Skill Verification.


Prompt injection backdoor (Zenity Labs, February 2026)​

Zenity Labs' "OpenClaw or OpenDoor?" showed indirect prompt injection turning OpenClaw into a persistent backdoor with no software bug involved:

PhaseActionPersistence
1. Initial accessIndirect prompt injection via a Google Document (zero-click)None
2. Telegram backdoorAgent creates an integration with an attacker-controlled botSession
3. SOUL.md editAttacker instructions written into the agent's identity fileSurvives restarts
4. Scheduled taskA Windows scheduled task re-injects instructions every 2 minutesSurvives SOUL.md cleanup
5. C2 implantTraditional command-and-control on the hostFull compromise

Upstream treats prompt injection by itself as out of scope; the defence is limiting what an injected agent can do (SECURITY.md). Penligent described it as "The Security Boundary That Doesn't Exist".


Moltbook Database Breach (January 31, 2026)​

404 Media reported a critical flaw in Moltbook, a separate social network for AI agents, found by researcher Jameson O'Reilly:

DetailFinding
VulnerabilitySupabase API key exposed in client-side JavaScript
Access grantedFull read and write access to all platform data
API tokens exposed1.5 million
Email addresses exposed35,000
Root causeNo Row Level Security policies
Time to fixHours, with help from Wiz researchers

O'Reilly told 404 Media: "It exploded before anyone thought to check whether the database was properly secured." Founder Matt Schlicht had said he "didn't write one line of code" for the platform. All agent API keys were reset after discovery. Moltbook is not part of OpenClaw, but agents connected to it exposed their owners' keys.


$16M Crypto Scam (January 27, 2026)​

On January 27, 2026, Anthropic sent a trademark notice about the name "Clawdbot", and the project began renaming to "Moltbot". To claim the new X handle, the old one had to be released first. In the roughly 10-second gap, scammers took both accounts and promoted a fake $CLAWD token on Solana. Its market cap reached about $16 million before Steinberger publicly denied involvement, then fell below $800K. Rekt News covered it as "Frankenclaw".


Credential storage (OX Security, February 2026)​

OX Security reported that credentials and API keys sat in cleartext under ~/.openclaw/, and that removed credentials were kept in backups. Plaintext is still the default for anything you put in openclaw.json or .env. Since then, model auth has moved into a per-agent SQLite store, and SecretRefs (env, file, exec and store providers) can replace plaintext. openclaw secrets audit --check reports what is left (secrets management, secrets and storage).


Government and corporate responses (early 2026)​

EntityAction
Gartner"Unacceptable cybersecurity risk"; recommended blocking downloads and traffic
CrowdStrikeSecurity briefing and a Falcon "Search & Removal Content Pack"
Kaspersky"OpenClaw found unsafe for use"
Naver, Kakao, Karrot (South Korea)Restricted OpenClaw on company networks and devices
China NVDBWarned about improperly configured deployments
Belgian CCB (Safeonweb)Advisory urging immediate patching
Token SecurityFound 22% of its enterprise customers had unauthorized OpenClaw deployments
Noma SecurityReported 53% of its enterprise customers gave OpenClaw privileged access in one weekend

OpenClaw's security response​

DateAction
2026-01-25PR #1795 merged: no implicit local trust behind an unconfigured reverse proxy
2026-01-30/31v2026.1.29 fixes CVE-2026-25253 and CVE-2026-25157; advisories published 2026-01-31
2026-02v2026.2.6: built-in skill and plugin code safety scanner (CHANGELOG/2026.2.6.md). ClawHub adds VirusTotal scanning on publish and rescan (THREAT-MODEL-ATLAS)
2026-04-24Issue #7916 (encrypted secrets) closed; SecretRefs ship (secrets management)
2026-05-01Issue #8081 (multi-user permissions) closed; gateway.roles and operator scopes ship (operator scopes)
PublishedThreat model mapped to MITRE ATLAS (THREAT-MODEL-ATLAS), trust model and reporting policy (SECURITY.md)

Full security timeline​

DateEventSeverity
Jan 25PR #1795 fixes reverse-proxy local-trust bypassMitigation
Jan 27Anthropic trademark notice; rename begins—
Jan 27X accounts hijacked; $CLAWD scam token reaches $16M—
Jan 27–29ClawHavoc: 335 malicious skills uploaded—
Jan 30–31CVE-2026-25253 fixed (v2026.1.29) and disclosedHigh (8.8)
Jan 31Censys: 21,639 exposed instances—
Jan 31Moltbook breach: 1.5M tokens, 35K emails—
Feb 2SecurityScorecard STRIKE: 40,214 exposed instances—
Feb 4Koi Security: 341 malicious ClawHub skills—
Feb 5Snyk ToxicSkills, Cisco, Zenity Labs and OX Security publish—
Febv2026.2.6 code safety scanner; ClawHub VirusTotal scanningMitigation
Feb 9Follow-up scans: 135,000+ exposed instances; JFrog 93.4% auth bypass figure—
Feb 14First three critical advisories (node invoke RCE, voice-call allowlist, plugin install path traversal)Critical
Mar 12–31Ten critical advisories: scope escalation to operator.admin, .env injection, sandbox escapesCritical
Apr 16Last critical advisory to date (Feishu webhook validation)Critical
Jun 3045 advisories published (33 High, 12 Medium), fixed by v2026.6.9High
Jun 30v2026.6.11: DOMPurify fix, lookalike package-source rejectionMitigation
Sep 3openclaw-windows-node: 8 advisories (6 High), fixed in v2026.7.1-3High
Sep 1175 advisories published (30 High, 40 Medium, 5 Low), fixed in 2026.7.1–2026.9.3High
Sep 11ClawHub: 5 advisories, fixed on clawhub.ai the same dayMedium
Sep 29VulnCheck CVE-2026-102806 and CVE-2026-102807, fixed in 2026.9.5 and 2026.9.4Medium
Oct 16v2026.10.4, the current stable release as of 2026-10-18—

The "Severity" column only labels advisories. Third-party incidents are not scored.


Reporting vulnerabilities​

Report to the repository where the issue lives (SECURITY.md):

Upstream usually closes these as not vulnerabilities: prompt injection without a policy, auth, approval or sandbox bypass; a malicious plugin after you installed it; several adversarial users sharing one Gateway; scanner-only reports with no working repro; and public internet exposure that the docs recommend against.


See also​